The Subjugation of Women in Religion

Comments

I think you are right about this too.....being about the culture and not the faith. I think though with the Amish and Menonites they choose that lifestyle (remember they go through that trial period where they can become English if they so desire)....WHERE Islamic women do not choose, they are born in the culture and have no choice but to stay there.....do you know what I mean? And am I right?? These middle Eastern women have no way out. Right?
It certainly would be easier for an Amish woman to leave, but they may be shunned by the community. (Shunned means they are spoken of as if they are dead, their family isn't allowed to contact them, if people see them in the streets they will cross to the other side, etc) So while Amish people could leave with more ease, it would come at a cost.

For women in Islamic nations it is harder, I suppose, but still possible. There are secular people in Islamic nations, but the women still often feel the pressure to dress conservatively- not because of the religion but the culture, just as in America there are areas where ALL women dress more conservatively because of societal standards. So when people talk about women killed for dressing revealingly- there's no way to know if those women were even Muslims. It's a problem with the law.
I should probably add, since you are newer to my blog, that my grandparents were Amish and left the faith a little before my mother was born, and I have Amish family, so this is something I've had some experience of. Fortunately my grandparents were only shunned for a short while, but depending on the area things can get really ugly.
wow....and do you talk to or see this family?? I think that is so neat!! Have you thought about the Amish and ever wanted to follow their faith at all??
My immediate family still goes to family reunions, and it's not uncommon for Amish relatives to be around when I visit my Grandma.

I really like the faith. While I wouldn't want to go all the way, I keep a garden, I conserve, I avoid using electricity as much as possible. I think there's honor in physical labor and doing for yourself (in fact, instead of buying bookshelves we recently made our own.) I especially like the Amish style of meal planning and cooking, which uses simple ingredients in several different ways, and relies on good wholesome flavors that are unembellished. It amuses me when people gush about Amish style potatoes, beef gravy and green beans. The potatoes are just potatoes hand mashed with whole cream milk, the beef gravy is just stew meat and broth thickened with flour, and the green beans are just beans braised in ham stock. Yet- I have to agree- a meal in an Amish or Mennonite home tastes better. Part of it I think is the love and devotion of the hands that made it.
Yep. Islamic law is NOT ISLAM.

And yeah, go ahead - cast the first stone, America, if we think that our cultural history has been any better than the rest of the world's when it comes to women.
[this is good]
This make a twisted reality. Although I agree with what you are saying there are so many difference that we are not aware of. Being an outspoken liberal I dread saying these next few words. There should be better dress codes for schools in America. There I said it.
Thanks. I'd not gone to Amberfire.in.us's blog yet, and the arguement is most compelling. I've been doing a lot of reserch on Iran lately, and I think the treatment of iranian women was important... I just wish I could figure out a format for what I want to write.
I commented on your WordPress blog - *great* post, shush!!!
if the Amish had oil and refused to share they would invaded ... years ago, well its easy to dress up your crusade in whatever ethnocentric garb you choose if the money is right
[this is good]
Hi Shush. My 2 cents worth? It all matters just how you define "subjugation" and how you define "freedom." Western countries use Enlightenment presuppositions in defining these terms, while Muslim countries use pre-modern presuppositions. Unfortunately, these are often at odds with one another. One person's prison is another person's paradise, and vise versa. All the world's religions were developed before the Enlightenment, and the Enlightenment was in no small part a rebellion against a religious worldview. Old line feminism has no room for any type of traditional gender roles, while pre-modern religion is completely inflexible about these roles.

Only in the western cultures, where Christianity has been largely subverted by modern presuppositions (US civil religion, Mainline and Emmergant Churches) does any of the World religions and Enlightenment ethics find themselves allied...


Why should you have dreaded it?

I'm sure it is possible to be liberal and still be for a modicum of decency, be for individual expression, but discourage distractions, gang colors, etc., etc.

As Thomas Jones sang, "Throw off your mental chains (woo hoo hoo!)"
But "the Enlightenment" isn't a universal thing by any means (which I'm sure you know; just sayin'...). AFAIK (and I may well be wrong about this), it hasn't had much effect on much of Eastern Europe, including the Balkans and Russia, though Catherine the Great *tried* to make it work in Russia. And I think you might find "Enlightenment" influence in many former French colonies, to some extent... Lebanon being one. (For the wealthy and highly literate, anyway.)
Thanks. I just you should be allowed to let your freak flag fly. lol. I graduated from High School in 1965 and the rules were very strict and I resented them, but I think we have gone to far the other way. Thanks again.

I think you have the wrong idea about Islamic women.

? ? ?

Could you possibly be more vague?
Shush, I wrote this HUGE response... wonder why it is not showing?
Sorry, I have no idea. Vox can be really tetchy which is why I moved over to WordPress.

Ok, so Ill write it all again.

I think you have the wrong impression about Muslim women. In MOST Muslim countries they are free to worship their religion as we are. No one makes them do anything.

Egypt considers itself a secular country. Therefore does not allow women to wear headscarves on television (news and such) because it doesn't want to give the impression to all that it is manditory. There are Christians and Jews that live there happily and no one looks twice.

There are many modern Islamic women who choose not to cover their hair. I know many of these. They are not shunned. It is their choice.

Before all of the madness, Iraq and Iran were both forward thinking countries. Women were educated and were doctors, lawyers etc.

In Kuwait, women drive, attend university, and hold jobs equal to men.

In Jordan, King Abdulla's wife does not wear a headscarf. She travels around Muslim countries teaching young girls about being a strong muslim woman. She is a Palestinian by birth, and her father is a doctor there. She, is the true meaning of a Queen.

Many of the other Islamic countries are the same. But of course, all we see is Saudi, and Afganistan. So sad.

Just remember, that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. More women are converting than men. That says something..doesnt it?.

Oh, and by the way, while in the ME, my husband and I couldnt help but see these shops full of clothes that would make even a young clubber blush. I was shocked so I asked, who wore these things?? With a smile, I was told that the women who wore Burqas did... underneath. Apparently, to be naughty, they like to flash....lol
I am absolutely aware of all of those things- but people like to use the extreme examples of countries that practice Sharia law in extreme and abusive ways to prove that women have no choice.

My point is that those examples- countries that operate under strict law- are largely that way because of the culture- culture that would probably exist even without the religion.

Most Islamic countries are very progressive, and the women who choose to live under strict doctrine do so out of choice.

I saw one interview on television where there was a secular woman who had become a doctor in Iraq prior to the war- it's very sad that so many parts of Iraq are now under Sharia law and that woman may no longer be free to make her own choices. But I don't blame the religion- I blame the men who use the religion as an excuse. I'm sure they would be just as brutal without it as a justification.
That is hilarious!
Just think of the word "modernity" as a simile for the word "Enlightenment," and you will see where the cultural battle lines are drawn all around the world. Eastern Europe, and especially Russia, knows all about the Enlightenment, as Marxist/Lenninist Communism was a form of hyper-modernity and was secular rationalism taken ti its logical conclusion.

The Muslim/traditionalist countries are generally pissed off at America on account of cultural issues, as "freedom" by secular definition is the smashing of any boundary, taboo, or responsibility that might bind or restrict personal autonomy. Freedom in much of the non-western world is defined as a person's ability to freely choose what boundary, taboo, or responsibility to live their lives by -- almost the exact opposite of what most Americans think of as freedom. Basically, reruns of "Dallas" and "Desperate Housewives" represent everything they abhor, while at the same time seduce the young and the immature.
I think we need to agree to disagree here, especially seeing that you're broad-brushing *all* Muslims in a very (I believe) myopic and unfair way. What about all the Muslims in diverse countries in sub-Saharan Africa, for example? They don't seem to figure in your equation. Sorry if I seem terse and annoyed, but I'm very tired of the way in which a LOT of American Christians seem to view Muslims (and Arabs, including Arab Christians) as somehow innately backward and "unenlightened." There is *so* much more to the picture than the clichés that are bandied about in the media (secular and religious). At this point, I feel like a lot of so-called "Christian" publishing houses are making big $$$ by issuing titles that do nothing but teach intolerance of other humans beings (and many, many religious beliefs, too). I don't think we North Americans have any right to go out and tell the rest of the world how they should live - especially given the fact that in so doing, we tend to be oblivious to the fact that the overwhelming majority of practicing Christians are:

1. not "white"

2. not from "first world" countries

FWIW, have you ever read Kenneth Cragg's book The Call of the Minaret? It would be well worth your time, I think.
Ah, something I forgot to say:

anyone who encourages Christ-like living is excepted from what i wrote in my previous comment.

I would SO love to see us US Christians living out "Mercy triumphs over judgment."
On another topic (sort of), check out this article on poet Mohja Kahf

Verrrry interesting...
A poem (very short) by Mohja Kahf (apologies to her for the mangling of her original typographical scheme):

Hijab Scene #2

“‘You people have such restrictive dress for women,’
she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink-collar temp pool day.

Amen. No pun intended. This is the best comment I read all day :)
Why thank you! :)

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in